Wheeler Farm Loops

Indianapolis Monumental Half Marathon

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesJake K's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
201120122013201420152016
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

SLC,UT,

Member Since:

Apr 28, 2011

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Other

Running Accomplishments:

PR Table and Notable Races

Marathon:
2:21:12 (Chicago); 2:20:41 (CIM)

Half Marathon: 1:05:45 (Long Beach)
10K: 30:03 (Portland)

All race results:
2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016

Personal:

   

Favorite Blogs:

Click to donate
to Ukraine's Armed Forces
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Race: Indianapolis Monumental Half Marathon (13.1 Miles) 01:05:54, Place overall: 7
Running MilesSwimming YardsBike Miles
17.000.000.00

Overall a decent race. Fastest time of the year. One second faster than I ran at PF Changs back in January. So I've come full circle... now I need to break out of that circle!

Before I say anything about my race, I want to give a shout to the IMM race organization (especially elite coordinator Matt Ebersole) for putting together such competitive fields. All 4 course records were shattered. An interesting storyline was that 16 year old Alana Hadley and 49 year old Colleen De Reuck (who ran 2:39!) both qualified for the Olympic Trials.

Weather was ideal (low 40s and the wind from the day before died off). The course was also great - an essentially flat loop with no surprises. My 1:05:54 converts to 1:05:54 on a flat, sea-level course :-)

I wanted to get out at just under 5:00 pace and come through 10K a little under 31 minutes. The pack was big off the start. I counted 14 guys ahead of me as we came though the mile (4:55). I tried to tuck in the back, but the Kenyans started to string it out in the second mile, and the big group already started to break up. Mile 2 was another 4:55. I had passed a few guys and moved up to a yellow singlet (Andrew Sherman). We ended up running pretty much the rest of the race together. We caught up to Jason Ordway in the 3rd mile (4:50, so 14:40 at 3 miles... too fast, borderline suicidal, although it didn't feel that way). We moved away from Jason and miles 4-6 were 4:54, 5:07, 4:58. Hit 10K in 30:48. On paper that doesn't look too bad, but it wasn't run evenly, and took a toll.

We had no one in sight in front of us, so Andrew and I were basically racing each other. The pace slowed from 7-9: 5:02, 5:08, 5:12 (ugly). A little after 15K another guy (Brandon York) moved up and caught us. Now we had a little pack of three, and the pace picked back up a little. Miles 10-12 were 5:05, 5:05, 5:08. Brandon and Andrew were both a little ahead of me with about a half-mile left. Andrea was waiting a quarter-mile from the finish and told me to be proud of my finish. That was a good thing to say and it got me going. I moved past Andrew, but Brandon still had a little gap on me. My legs felt like lead but I mustered up a some mental fortitude and was able to beat him to the finish by a few strides. I felt good about how I finished. The last mile was 4:59 and then ~29-30 for the last tenth. Unfortunately at the moment the results show that Brandon finished ahead of me (probably due to the chip time). Order of finish and gun time always supercedes chip, so hopefully the timing company will get that sorted out. In the grand scheme of things, the difference between 7th and 8th place doesn't mean anything, but I worked hard in the last quarter mile and want to results to reflect that. [Fixed]. Here's the official results. Deep race with 9 guys under 1:06.

After the race Andrea and I talked to Jason D for a bit (blog friends exist in real life!), then cooled down for a while, wandering around downtown Indy. We both liked the city and we'll keep this area on our radar for races next spring (maybe the Indy Mini 1/2). We watched the lead marathoners come in and cheered on Paul, then headed back to our hotel. Luckily we had enough time to hit Steak 'n Shake for lunch with Scott Wietecha and his wife before flying back home. Quick trip!

I knew sub-65 was a longshot, so I'm not at all disappointed in the outcome. I've said this before, but anytime you break 66 on a fair course, its a good performance and you can't be too upset because it doesn't happen by accident. I definitely learned a few things that I think will be valuable as I approach CIM in 5 weeks (and half-marathons next spring). My PR of 1:05:45 from October 2011 will unfortunately survive another year. Before I think about trying to break 1:05, I need to beat that time, and break 1:05:30. Smaller steps. And I definitely run better off negative splits, not going out hard and hanging on.

For the upcoming marathon, I need to be realistic about what my current capabilities are and try to maximize my chances for a good performance (not just go for 2:17 because that's what I want to run). That will probably mean going out a bit slower and not necessarily chasing the OTQ standard. I've got 2 years to chase it... I still haven't run a really good marathon, so that should (and will) be my main goal. Plus, anything can happen if you aren't going backwards in the last 10 miles.

Comments
From Bonnie on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 08:30:19 from 64.119.33.134

Wow!!

From ScottC on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:41:22 from 160.7.232.104

Dang, you're fast Jake! Look forward to reading your full report!

From Yasir on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 11:08:25 from 99.20.240.112

Great job now im ready to get out and run my ass off. you are fast an tough.

From steve ash on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:00:50 from 174.52.100.252

Killer time Jake as always and in a really tough field also. Congrats on that!

From josse on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 13:21:03 from 70.208.0.120

Way to go

From Holt on Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 17:37:51 from 50.8.79.137

Good job Jake.

From joebell1981 on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:22:04 from 99.39.133.24

Awesome, Jake - great race! Sorry I didn't see Andrea's message until later - would've loved to meet up with you guys.

From jtshad on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 07:13:21 from 69.20.183.178

Great job Jake!

From Fritz on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 08:46:50 from 174.239.97.0

Great job Jake. Top 10 in a race with 25 guys sub 1:10 is awesome. 1:05:55 is a killer time.

From Jake K on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:08:48 from 67.177.11.154

Thanks guys. Not an A+, but not bad either.

I put up my report.

From SlowJoe on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:10:04 from 166.147.72.21

Great race and great recap Jake. You will break out of that circle soon - man, what a competitive race!

From Matt Schreiber on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:14:01 from 66.17.102.185

Awesome job Jake. Smart move on running w/in your capabilities. You're running strong and will progress nicely over the next year and a half. Big congrats on the finish in a race with that kind of competition.

From Josh E on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:28:49 from 71.213.3.115

Congrats Jake. Glad you went for it in the first half. I wonder how much the pack impacted your race. I think if there was a pack running 5-5:02 avg from 7-12, you could've hung with them. You can't feel bad losing to Michael Jordan.

From Superfly on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:48:42 from 74.211.21.81

Awesome job Jake. I love your positive attitude all the time. Plus solid races all year long. Great leadership and example to everyone else.

From Kendall on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 12:07:15 from 70.208.7.172

Well-planned and executed. Nice work on the race and great set-up leading into CIM.

From allie on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 12:55:50 from 97.126.219.219

i like that shot at the start line -- you are READY to go. slightly more intense than the start line photos from SoJo.

great race, jake. 14:40 at 3!! now that's racing. way to go for it and compete so well against a strong field.

great stories about alana hadley and colleen de reuck. 16 and 49!

and andrea's 5k! what a great day.

From Paul on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 13:38:58 from 71.215.78.30

Nice job, another extremely solid race. I think you're right: anytime you break 66 it's a pretty decent race, because it's really difficult to do. I learned in Duluth just how HARD breaking 66 is, not to speak of 65! But you have a good gauge of your current fitness now, and sub-2:20 is looking very achievable at CIM.

From Jon on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 18:58:53 from 107.203.52.135

Wow, you're just very consistent. Nice work.

From Jason D on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 20:18:12 from 24.1.80.94

You went for it on this one. 29:39 for the leader at 10k is crazy. He would have had a few seconds if he didn't go into the 5k at the finish though! (Video to follow)

I missed getting a video because I was biting my nails and watching the clock, but the way you came through that finish I thought you might Machuka those guys in the neck. I did get a few photos and a video of the start.

I know you mentioned wishing you ran the marathon, but this gives you some time to get some other stuff in and you got a chance to run a flat, sea-level course with cool weather. Two 1:09:59 halfs should feel "easy" after that first 10k and rest of that half.

From Jake K on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 21:07:17 from 67.177.11.154

That finish was a little wild... the kids K was finishing right as we were coming in... and the kids weren't necessarily as good about staying on their side of the finishing straightaway :-)

The 14:40 3 mile split was really stupid. I should have known that even though it didn't feel that hard at the time, it would come back to bite me. And it did. Need to exercise more patience and deliberately hold myself back. Its an easy problem to fix, and I'm very confident it will pay off if I actually start doing that.

From Jason D on Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 22:32:41 from 24.1.80.94

I've finished in the same spot twice, but never noticed those ledges. Some of the other runners weren't good about staying in their lanes either: :-)

http://tinyurl.com/kvbdhzm

From RileyCook on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:42:07 from 208.54.5.242

Great race Jake and way to hold on after a very fast start. You are so consistent at these flat sea level races, it's very impressive. And like you say it sure isn't easy to break 1:06 and yet you do it almost every sea level half you attempt.

That breakthrough is coming. It is. Just keep at it.

From CollinAnderson on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:10:25 from 128.110.95.156

Good run. Technically, I'd give you a 1:05:24 equivalent performance (estimating the very slight roll and an average altitude of 700'). :) By the way, finishing one place behind Michael Jordan in any sort of athletic competition doesn't sound so bad to me. :)

From Jake K on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:51:22 from 159.212.71.25

If I had known that guy in front was MICHAEL JORDAN, I might have been able to make a furious push from a mile out and get him. He was wearing a purple-ish singlet, not a Bulls (or even Wizards) jersey. Stealth mode.

Finish line photos confirmed that I did beat Brandon York (I really started second guessing myself yesterday and thought maybe I imagined it)... so I hope they change the order in the official results.

From allie on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 13:07:06 from 97.126.219.219

MJ's pinterest photos confirm he ran the race in jazz jersey.

From Christie on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 15:18:54 from 74.213.202.246

Congrats on your race Jake. Your attitude and approach to goals is such a great example for many of us!

From Sasha Pachev on Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 16:15:10 from 69.28.149.129

Jake:

I have an idea. See if you can get Scott to pull you at exactly 4:58 per mile on some flat sea-level course that is likely to have ideal conditions. Does not have to be a big race, maybe even better if it is not - then Scott will not feel like he sacrificing prize money to give you an OTQ.

The reason I am suggesting this is that based on your splits I believe you are capable of 1:05 low or even a little under if the stars align, but a couple of things need to come together. You need somebody that is carrying the proverbial carrot/stick combination the entire race, and you need to believe this enough that when you get to mile 6 you are not scared to run another 4:58 and then see what happens. As you probably know very well, there is a big difference between believing you can run mile 7 in 4:58 at the start, and believing that when it is time to actually do it. You need to learn to run like the best Kenyans - no doubt, no fear.

This is easier said than done. In my entire career I feel that I've been able to achieve that only on occasion, and I greatly value those occasions. It required special training. When I succeeded my whole training and racing was centered on running by faith - find that fine line between the merely unbelievable and actually physically impossible, and train at it. Challenge the physically impossible once in a while to make sure your judgement is not off.

I tried to teach Benjamin how to run like this using Alma 56 in the Book of Mormon and found it quite effective. The line that I like to recount and ponder is "they never had fought, yet they did not fear death". When he understood it, he was able to perform above what he thought was his limit.

From Jake K on Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 13:30:25 from 159.212.71.199

Good thoughts Sasha. Along those lines, I think that's why starting a little slower is so important - that way you are closing in on the "carrot" instead of watching it slip away from you. Have full belief that you can achieve it. I agree... it doesn't happen otherwise.

Good news - I moved up to 7th place in the official results, and 1:05:54! So, it WAS my fastest time of the year (and since Oct 2011). A massive improvement considering it took Paul 3 years to make the same jump over twice the distance :-)

From Rachelle on Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 14:16:26 from 159.212.71.173

Congratulations on a great race race Jake! You are always so consistent and never cease to amaze me. Your mental strength never falters and I admire your example.

From Sasha Pachev on Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 14:46:24 from 69.28.149.129

Jake:

To clarify. So you go out at 4:58. Mile 1, so far so good, feels easy. Next mile a little harder, but you do not feel scared. Now you get to mile 7. Now the pace is hard enough that you are scared to run another 4:58. You ease off a little, let's say to 5:03 and there goes your OTQ. 5:03 is just too cozy of a pace at that point. It will take a super-human effort to speed up to 4:57 average in the remaining 5 miles.

Thus 4:58 in mile 7 is the key to running an OTQ. If you could just overcome the doubts in mile 7, you are 30% there, maybe even 60% there. Miles 8 and 9 will be hard, but when you get to 10, it will take character but not a super-human to be able to say - I hit 10 in 49:40, I only need a 15:20 5 K, there is no way in the world I am letting this slip. You may have a rough patch at 11, but if you slack there, you will get mad at yourself and run the last mile in 4:45.

Now, it is true that keeping all of your early miles at exactly 4:58 will make it physically easier to run mile 7 in 4:58. But we run with more than physiology. Sometimes a surge in 4:53 reprograms the mind to take more pain, so you go back to 4:58 and it feels quite manageable while the monotony of the 4:58 becomes so tedious that you manage to convince yourself you lack the fitness to keep it. The results will vary from person to person I suppose, but the key principle that psychologically tuned pacing will in many cases beat the physiologically tuned pacing.

The big problem to solve is how to train for mile 7 in 4:58. Maybe a good approach would be to run an 8 mile tempo at exactly 4:58 down the Provo Canyon or similar grade for the first 6 and then run 4:54 and 4:50 to shake the fist at the physical and mental fatigue. We are, of course betting on Provo Canyon being on par with the sea-level flat in terms of effort quality.

From Matt Poulsen on Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:27:52 from 174.52.216.185

Very nicely done, Jake! You're an animal! There is no doubt that sub 1:05 is in your future.

From Teena Marie on Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:57:29 from 155.99.215.219

As always, crazy impressive!!!

I LOVE the starting line pic!!! :)

From Scott Wesemann on Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 14:34:20 from 66.232.64.4

Wow, that is fast! I always feel inspired reading your race reports. Nice work.

From Tara on Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 13:48:24 from 75.169.140.158

Great report and race, Jake! Hot dog, top dog! I made that up. So cool for the other OTQ'ers, too!

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: